Another very good video from Dan Heath about making an anchor + twist.
This method really works well to make a message more concrete. Dan gives the example of linking your product/service/company/ … to a well-known competitor that’s in the same business domain. That is the anchor. It’s also important to add a twist that shows in what way you are different (cheaper, faster, different service, …).
Eg: twitter is a form of mini-blogging (blogging is the anchor and mini is the twist)
Last friday I gave a talk about worksimplification. We talked what it is and how it is done.
The second part was about why we could do worksimplification.
I had seen Michael video (link below) a couple of days before and I took the experiment to tell some stories about competition. I used the story of the bear. (Thanks Raf for pointing that one out).
I worked out extremely well. Got great feedback on the storytelling piece.
One of the participants told me, you painted the picture about the two guys been chased by the bear in my head. I will not forget it when I think about competition.
If a story is used well it get people into action and it will be more than entertainment. The story can be a catalist for action.
I think that Michael has a point that humans are hard-wired for storytelling.
From October 27 – 30, the European Conference on Creativity and Innovation took place in Brussels. The main theme of this year was ‘Make it happen’ so Johan and Cyriel had to be there and give a workshop around making messages contagious. We gave a nice workshop for 15 participants and showed them the ‘a Spoonful of Sparkles’ process. It was very interactive because after a small introduction, the participants could work on their own story to make it more sticky. We got some good reactions and feedback and are looking forward for our next workshops.
And Johan achieved his challenge to be on stage before 250 people and explain the 6 principles of the ‘Succes’-story. And Cyriel was one of the hosts of the conference. More info about the conference?
Two adds which use the same tool to grab our attention and to keep it till the end of the message.
Which add is more effective? More effective in getting the message across?
The first one ?
Or the other one?
In my mind the Pepsi is more effective. Both the adds use humor and curiosity. Curiosity is a powerfull tool in keeping our attention. It creates open loops in your mind. Open loops which you want to close.
The Pepsi add uses humor to reinforce the message and it closes the loop in your mind with an image that underlines the message.
This is a picture I got from Richard. Richard is at least a half day a week on the streets making pictures. You can find every day a picture by him on his site.
You can’t eat our sandwiches without a fork.
What mental images do you get by reading this? A huge plate with vegetables and other things? It’s very hard not to imagine something when you read this sign. At the same time it makes you as a reader curious. It creates an open hole in your knowledge. The good thing is that you can close that hole on the spot. Our brain is wired to fill these holes. Walk in and find out….
It combines concreteness, credibility and a bit of surprise.
A couple of weeks ago I moved the the book Life’s a Pitch (Stephen Bayley & Roger Mavity) from my candidate booklist to my active booklist.
The book has great insights and great stories.
The next is story is from this book. It’s about Sir Gerry Robinson. He has been Chairman of the Arts Council and delivered a great pitch to Tony Blair.
His pitch is great because it simple, very concrete, emotional and credible.
The next is from the book p112
Gerry was choosen to run the Arts Council because the Blair Government thought the Council was badly and extravagantly managed, so they wanted a hard-headed businessman to get hold of it and cut the waste. But when Gerry studie dit, he quickly decided the arts needed more money not less. I asked him how he pitched this difficult case to the very people who had put him in place to recommend the opposite.
Gerry answered :
I had to point out that the problems weren’t just the inefficiencies, although there was some of that, but the arts were just ludicrously underfunded. Any civilized nation should fund the arts properly. I felt that it was a credible proposition for me to be saying that rather than someone from the arts world.
I just knew that the way to get the money was to point out that was needed, £200 million, was in real terms absolutely bugger all. I reminded them it was just about the cost of one F-11 jet.
Gerry used concreteness, surprise, emotion and credibility to be understood, remembered and to change behaviour.
The credibility didn’ t came from the message itself. It was Gerry who gave the credibility. If it had been somebody from the Arts Council and not a tough businessman the message would not have had credibility.
Gerry surprised Tony Blair. Blair expected to hear ideas for cuts inbudgets.
“Any civilized nation” is a great phrase for building identity. It creates emotion because who wants to be prime minister of a nation that is not that civil anymore.
Gerry used the concreteness for his audience. In order for Tony Blair to be able grasp the amount Gerry used an image from his world.